From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:08:31 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: dts: OMAP36xx: : DT spelling s/#address-cell/#address-cells/ In-Reply-To: References: <1461166339-11109-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1461166339-11109-5-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Message-ID: <20160426160831.GT5995@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Rob Herring [160420 16:48]: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi > > index ce1e242d4dc07ea8..8b797915300894d8 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi > > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ > > abb_mpu_iva: regulator-abb-mpu { > > compatible = "ti,abb-v1"; > > regulator-name = "abb_mpu_iva"; > > - #address-cell = <0>; > > + #address-cells = <0>; > > dtc should flag this if it was really needed. However, it looks like > it isn't as there are no child nodes (unless the board files add > them). > > A nice dtc check would be to flag unnecessary #address-cells or > #size-cells. That would only help here after your fix though. Yeah. Applying patches 2 - 4 into omap-for-v4.7/dt thanks. Tony