From: jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com (Jan Glauber)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:51:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160427105156.GB2624@hardcore> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160426135354.GR27312@arm.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:53:54PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
[...]
> >
> > That sounds like a good compromise.
> >
> > So I could do the following:
> >
> > 1) In the uncore setup check for CONFIG_NUMA, if set use the NUMA
> > information to determine the device node
> >
> > 2) If CONFIG_NUMA is not set we check if we run on a socketed system
> >
> > a) In that case we return an error and give a message that CONFIG_NUMA needs
> > to be enabled
> > b) Otherwise we have a single node system and use node_id = 0
>
> That sounds sensible to me. How do you "check if we run on a socketed
> system"? My assumption would be that you could figure this out from the
> firmware tables?
There are probably multiple ways to detect a socketed system, with some quite
hardware specific. I would like to avoid parsing DT (and ACPI) though,
if possible.
A generic approach would be to do a query of the multiprocessor affinity
register (MPIDR_EL1) on all CPUs. The AFF2 part (bits 23:16) contains the
socket number on ThunderX. If this is non-zero on any CPU I would assume a
socketed system.
Would that be feasible?
thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-09 16:21 [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support Jan Glauber
2016-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64/perf: Basic uncore counter support for Cavium ThunderX Jan Glauber
2016-04-19 15:06 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-20 12:29 ` Jan Glauber
2016-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64/perf: Cavium ThunderX L2C TAD uncore support Jan Glauber
2016-04-19 15:43 ` Mark Rutland
2016-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] arm64/perf: Cavium ThunderX L2C CBC " Jan Glauber
2016-04-19 15:56 ` Mark Rutland
2016-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64/perf: Cavium ThunderX LMC " Jan Glauber
2016-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64/perf: Cavium ThunderX OCX TLK " Jan Glauber
2016-04-04 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support Jan Glauber
2016-04-25 11:22 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-25 12:02 ` Jan Glauber
2016-04-25 13:19 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-26 12:08 ` Jan Glauber
2016-04-26 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-27 10:51 ` Jan Glauber [this message]
2016-04-27 11:18 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <CAEiAFz3eCsX3VoNus_Rq+En5zuB8fAxNCbC3ktw2NqLKwC=_kA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-19 10:35 ` Jan Glauber
2016-04-19 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-28 10:24 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-28 14:04 ` Jan Glauber
2016-07-04 10:11 ` Will Deacon
2016-09-16 7:55 ` Will Deacon
2016-09-16 8:39 ` Jan Glauber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160427105156.GB2624@hardcore \
--to=jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox