From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hzpeterchen@gmail.com (Peter Chen) Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:15:25 +0800 Subject: [RFC v2 00/13] usb/mmc/power: Fix USB/LAN when TFTP booting In-Reply-To: <572C35C8.9080709@samsung.com> References: <1462451666-17945-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160505224240.GA31429@rob-hp-laptop> <20160506054459.GA32359@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net> <572C35C8.9080709@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20160506071525.GB32359@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:12:24AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/06/2016 07:44 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:42:40PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 02:34:13PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> This is a different, second try to fix usb3503+lan on Odroid U3 board > >>> if it was initialized by bootloader (e.g. for TFTP boot). > >>> > >>> First version: > >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg140042.html > >>> > >>> > >>> Problem > >>> ======= > >>> When Odroid U3 (usb3503 + smsc95xx + max77686) boots from network (TFTP), > >>> the usb3503 and LAN smsc95xx do not show up in "lsusb". Hard-reset > >>> is required, e.g. by suspend to RAM. The actual TFTP boot does > >>> not have to happen. Just "usb start" from U-Boot is sufficient. > >>> > >>> From the schematics, the regulator is a supply only to LAN, however > >>> without toggling it off/on, the usb3503 hub won appear neither. > >>> > >>> > >>> Solution > >>> ======== > >>> This is very similar to the MMC pwrseq behavior so the idea is to: > >>> 1. Move MMC pwrseq drivers to generic place, > >> > >> You can do that, but I'm going to NAK any use of pwrseq bindings outside > >> of MMC. I think it is the wrong way to do things. The DT should describe > >> the devices. If they happen to be "simple" then the core can walk the > >> tree and do any setup. For example, look for "reset-gpios" and toggle > >> that GPIO. There is no need for a special node. > >> > > > > Oh, I am doing the same thing like this patch set doing. > > Shame on me that I did not use Google before starting the work. I could > just extend your patchset. I think we can combine our efforts. > Sure :) -- Best Regards, Peter Chen