From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 16:15:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] pwm: tegra-dfll: Add driver for Tegra DFLL PWM
 controller
In-Reply-To: <20160422125513.GJ9047@ulmo.ba.sec>
References: <1461321071-6431-1-git-send-email-pchiu@nvidia.com>
 <1461321071-6431-6-git-send-email-pchiu@nvidia.com>
 <20160422125513.GJ9047@ulmo.ba.sec>
Message-ID: <20160506231532.GK3492@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 04/22, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:31:05PM +0800, Penny Chiu wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/nvidia,tegra-dfll-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/nvidia,tegra-dfll-pwm.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..bd0d247
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/nvidia,tegra-dfll-pwm.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > +Tegra SoC DFLL PWM controller
> 
> Stephen, we have in the past used tegra124 in names, even if the IP was
> already included in tegra114, but we never supported it on Tegra114 and
> hence couldn't even verify that the binding was valid. Any preference as
> to the name in this particular case?

You meant Stephen Warren right? I don't care either way.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project