From: alex.williamson@redhat.com (Alex Williamson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: VFIO MSIX Query
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:20:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509092015.39129d56@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB995MvxU+mN9uxr_20nLkoezyhedUAHdFWawk-GG_bj0YjSYw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 8 May 2016 20:45:10 +0530
Nitin Saxena <nitin.lnx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for your answer. I got the point that all access to device must be
> VFIO.
> I have few more questions.
>
> >> When the device is initially opened via the VFIO_GET_DEVICE_FD ioctl, we
> go through an initialization sequence on the device, including a device
> reset
> Does this mean only one process (primary in multiprocess app) can only
> perform VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD ioctl ? which I doubt as I saw in dpdk
> that each process (regardless primary or not) does VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD
> ioctl. Kindly confirm.
Users can call GET_DEVICE_FD multiple times, but note that the group
file descriptor can only be opened once, so you'd need to pass
device file descriptors off to other threads.
> >> Use VFIO for all access to the device or don't use VFIO at all.
> I will map PCI BARS via VFIO but what about hugepages for each process.
> Since I am using VFIO_NOIOMMU do I need to call VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA ioctl
> for each hugepage of each process? I think this is not needed in my case.
> Please confirm.
No-IOMMU mode does not have MAP_DMA or UNMAP_DMA ioctls. If you want
to support a safe operating mode, with an IOMMU providing DMA
isolation, then yes, you would need to map DMA targets for the device
using those ioctls for the type1 IOMMU backend.
> Can you please also confirm about the patch I attached. Is there any thing
> missing in the patch that I needed to incorporate from kernel 4.5 to make
> VFO NOIOMMU work? Patch
I can't confirm or deny whether the backport is accurate. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAB995Mu0==PJ0iU4h_3oAMGo-VYDFrjOg_BO757M=PDWgMWtCw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-03 20:02 ` VFIO MSIX Query Alex Williamson
2016-05-04 2:12 ` Saxena, Nitin
[not found] ` <CAB995MsFjv=GvHSmo029fmuTWhGiYev3-2A358orFz_dq724Fw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-08 1:50 ` Alex Williamson
[not found] ` <CAB995MvxU+mN9uxr_20nLkoezyhedUAHdFWawk-GG_bj0YjSYw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-09 15:20 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2016-05-03 18:42 Saxena, Nitin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509092015.39129d56@t450s.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).