From: alex.williamson@redhat.com (Alex Williamson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 2/7] vfio/type1: vfio_find_dma accepting a type argument
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 16:49:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509164928.518a05a8@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462362858-2925-3-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
On Wed, 4 May 2016 11:54:13 +0000
Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote:
> In our RB-tree we now have slots of different types (USER and RESERVED).
> It becomes useful to be able to search for dma slots of a specific type or
> any type. This patch proposes an implementation for that modality and also
> changes the existing callers using the USER type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index aaf5a6c..2d769d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -98,23 +98,64 @@ struct vfio_group {
> * into DMA'ble space using the IOMMU
> */
>
> -static struct vfio_dma *vfio_find_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> - dma_addr_t start, size_t size)
> +/**
> + * vfio_find_dma_from_node: looks for a dma slot intersecting a window
> + * from a given rb tree node
> + * @top: top rb tree node where the search starts (including this node)
> + * @start: window start
> + * @size: window size
> + * @type: window type
> + */
> +static struct vfio_dma *vfio_find_dma_from_node(struct rb_node *top,
> + dma_addr_t start, size_t size,
> + enum vfio_iova_type type)
> {
> - struct rb_node *node = iommu->dma_list.rb_node;
> + struct rb_node *node = top;
> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
>
> while (node) {
> - struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node);
> -
> + dma = rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node);
> if (start + size <= dma->iova)
> node = node->rb_left;
> else if (start >= dma->iova + dma->size)
> node = node->rb_right;
> else
> + break;
> + }
> + if (!node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* a dma slot intersects our window, check the type also matches */
> + if (type == VFIO_IOVA_ANY || dma->type == type)
> + return dma;
> +
> + /* restart 2 searches skipping the current node */
> + if (start < dma->iova) {
> + dma = vfio_find_dma_from_node(node->rb_left, start,
> + size, type);
> + if (dma)
> return dma;
> }
> + if (start + size > dma->iova + dma->size)
> + dma = vfio_find_dma_from_node(node->rb_right, start,
> + size, type);
It might be nice to split this little bit of trickery out to a separate
patch so that you can better explain what it does. It's really not
needed until we start creating user-type entries, so it shouldn't hurt
bisection.
> + return dma;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vfio_find_dma: find a dma slot intersecting a given window
> + * @iommu: vfio iommu handle
> + * @start: window base iova
> + * @size: window size
> + * @type: window type
> + */
> +static struct vfio_dma *vfio_find_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + dma_addr_t start, size_t size,
> + enum vfio_iova_type type)
> +{
> + struct rb_node *top_node = iommu->dma_list.rb_node;
>
> - return NULL;
> + return vfio_find_dma_from_node(top_node, start, size, type);
> }
>
> static void vfio_link_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *new)
> @@ -488,19 +529,21 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> * mappings within the range.
> */
> if (iommu->v2) {
> - dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, 0);
> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, 0, VFIO_IOVA_USER);
> if (dma && dma->iova != unmap->iova) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock;
> }
> - dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0);
> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0,
> + VFIO_IOVA_USER);
> if (dma && dma->iova + dma->size != unmap->iova + unmap->size) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock;
> }
> }
>
> - while ((dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, unmap->size))) {
> + while ((dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, unmap->size,
> + VFIO_IOVA_USER))) {
> if (!iommu->v2 && unmap->iova > dma->iova)
> break;
> unmapped += dma->size;
> @@ -604,7 +647,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>
> - if (vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, size)) {
> + if (vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, size, VFIO_IOVA_ANY)) {
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> return -EEXIST;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 11:54 [PATCH v9 0/7] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 3/3: vfio changes Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] vfio: introduce a vfio_dma type field Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] vfio/type1: vfio_find_dma accepting a type argument Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2016-05-10 14:54 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] vfio/type1: bypass unmap/unpin and replay for VFIO_IOVA_RESERVED slots Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-11 12:58 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] vfio: allow reserved msi iova registration Eric Auger
2016-05-05 19:22 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-09 7:55 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-10 15:29 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 15:34 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio/type1: also check IRQ remapping capability at msi domain Eric Auger
2016-05-05 19:23 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-09 8:05 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 16:10 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-10 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-11 8:38 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-11 9:31 ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-11 9:44 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-11 13:48 ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-11 14:37 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu: do not advertise IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] vfio/type1: return MSI geometry through VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO capability chains Eric Auger
2016-05-04 12:06 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-09 23:03 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 16:50 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 16:36 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-20 16:01 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 3/3: vfio changes Eric Auger
2016-06-08 8:29 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-08 21:06 ` Alex Williamson
2016-06-09 7:55 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-09 19:44 ` Alex Williamson
2016-06-20 15:42 ` Pranav Sawargaonkar
2016-06-20 15:46 ` Pranav Sawargaonkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509164928.518a05a8@t450s.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).