From: alex.williamson@redhat.com (Alex Williamson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/7] vfio/type1: bypass unmap/unpin and replay for VFIO_IOVA_RESERVED slots
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 16:49:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509164936.1a5ae402@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462362858-2925-4-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
On Wed, 4 May 2016 11:54:14 +0000
Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote:
> Before allowing the end-user to create VFIO_IOVA_RESERVED dma slots,
> let's implement the expected behavior for removal and replay. As opposed
> to user dma slots, IOVAs are not systematically bound to PAs and PAs are
> not pinned. VFIO just initializes the IOVA "aperture". IOVAs are allocated
> outside of the VFIO framework, typically the MSI layer which is
> responsible to free and unmap them. The MSI mapping resources are freeed
> by the IOMMU driver on domain destruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> v7 -> v8:
> - do no destroy anything anymore, just bypass unmap/unpin and iommu_map
> on replay
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 2d769d4..94a9916 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> long unlocked = 0;
>
> - if (!dma->size)
> + if (!dma->size || dma->type != VFIO_IOVA_USER)
> return;
> /*
> * We use the IOMMU to track the physical addresses, otherwise we'd
> @@ -727,6 +727,9 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> iova = dma->iova;
>
> + if (dma->type == VFIO_IOVA_RESERVED)
> + continue;
> +
But you do still need some sort of replay mechanism, right? Not to
replay the IOVA to PA mapping, but to call iommu_msi_set_aperture() for
the new domain. How will you know that this entry is an MSI reserved
range or something else? Perhaps we can't have a generic "reserved"
type here.
> while (iova < dma->iova + dma->size) {
> phys_addr_t phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, iova);
> size_t size;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 11:54 [PATCH v9 0/7] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 3/3: vfio changes Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] vfio: introduce a vfio_dma type field Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] vfio/type1: vfio_find_dma accepting a type argument Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 14:54 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] vfio/type1: bypass unmap/unpin and replay for VFIO_IOVA_RESERVED slots Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2016-05-11 12:58 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] vfio: allow reserved msi iova registration Eric Auger
2016-05-05 19:22 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-09 7:55 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-10 15:29 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 15:34 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio/type1: also check IRQ remapping capability at msi domain Eric Auger
2016-05-05 19:23 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-09 8:05 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 16:10 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-10 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-11 8:38 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-11 9:31 ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-11 9:44 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-11 13:48 ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-11 14:37 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu: do not advertise IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP Eric Auger
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] vfio/type1: return MSI geometry through VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO capability chains Eric Auger
2016-05-04 12:06 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-09 23:03 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 16:50 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-09 22:49 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-10 16:36 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-20 16:01 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 3/3: vfio changes Eric Auger
2016-06-08 8:29 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-08 21:06 ` Alex Williamson
2016-06-09 7:55 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-09 19:44 ` Alex Williamson
2016-06-20 15:42 ` Pranav Sawargaonkar
2016-06-20 15:46 ` Pranav Sawargaonkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509164936.1a5ae402@t450s.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).