From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: DT: bindings: Add Broadcom STB PCIe bindings
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 14:26:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509192641.GA4936@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462475700-1654-2-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:14:59PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> From: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
>
> This patchs adds the Device Tree bindings for the Broadcom STB PCIe root
> complex hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>
> - rewrite the binding document almost from scratch to include many more
> references to existing documents
> - describe missing properties
> - give better examples
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,brcmstb-pcie.txt | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,brcmstb-pcie.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,brcmstb-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,brcmstb-pcie.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3682b0f0bc26
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,brcmstb-pcie.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
> +Broadcom STB PCIe Host Controller Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +This document describes the binding of the PCIe Root Complex hardware found in
> +Broadcom Set Top Box System-on-Chips such as BCM7425 (MIPS), BCM7435 (MIPS) and
> +BCM7445 (ARMv7).
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: must be one of: "brcm,bcm7425-pcie"
> + "brcm,bcm7435-pcie"
> + "brcm,bcm7445-pcie"
> +
> +- reg: specifies the physical base address of the controller registers and
> + its length
> +
> +- interrupt-parent: must be a reference (phandle) to the parent interrupt
> + controller in the system (7038-l1-intc on MIPS, GIC on ARM/ARM64)
> +
> +- interrrupts: first interrupt must be the Level 1 interrupt number corresponding
> + to the main PCIe RC interrupt, second interrupt must be the MSI interrupt
> + See the interrupt-parent documentation for the number of cells and their meaning:
> + MIPS: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/brcm,bcm7038-l1-intc.txt
> + ARM/ARM64: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt
> +
> +- interrupt-names: must be "pcie", and if present "msi"
> +
> +- interrupt-map: see pci.txt
> +
> +- interrupt-map-mask: see pci.txt
> +
> +- #address-cells: must be set to <3>, see pci.txt
> +
> +- #size-cells: must be set to <2>, see pci.txt
> +
> +- ranges: ranges for the PCI outbound windows, no I/O or prefetchable windows
> + must be specified here, only non-prefetchable. 32-bits windows or 64-bits
> + windows are allowed based on the host processor's capabilities (ARM w/ LPAE,
> + ARM64).
> +
> +- #interrupt-cells: set to <1>, see pci.txt
> +
> +- brcm,log2-scb-sizes: log2 size of the SCB window that is mapped to PCIe space
> + there must be exactly one value per memory controller present in the system
> + (ranges from 1 to 3)
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +- msi-controller: indicates that this is a MSI controller node (when supported)
> +
> +- clocks: phandle to the functional clock that feeds into the PCIe RC block
> +
> +- clock-names: the name(s) of the clocks specified in 'clocks'. Note
> + that if the 'clocks' property is given, 'clock-names' is mandatory,
> + and the name of the clock is expected to be "pcie".
> +
> +- brcm,ssc: boolean that indicates usage of spread-spectrum clocking
Shouldn't this be a property of the phy? Is there no separate phy to
control?
> +
> +- brcm,gen: integer that indicates desired forced generation of link: 1 => 2.5
> + Gbps, 2 => 5.0 Gbps, 3 => 8.0 Gbps. Will override the auto-negotation if
> + specified.
> +
> +- <*>-supply: see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> +
> +- <*>-supply-names: see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> +
> +Example Node:
> +
> +This example assumes that the top-level #address-cells = <2> and #size-cells =
> +<2>, e.g: ARM LPAE configuration.
> +
> + pcie0: pcie-controller at f0460000 {
> + reg = <0x0 0xf0460000 0x0 0x9310>;
> + interrupts = <0x0 0x33 0x4>, <0x0 0x34, 0x4>;
^
typo
> + interrupt-names = "pcie", "msi";
> + compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-pcie";
> + #address-cells = <3>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + /* Two non-prefetchable 32-bits memory space, each of 128MB
> + * with the following mapping:
> + * PCIe address => CPU physical address space
> + * 0x00_0000_0000 => 0x00_C000_0000
> + * 0x00_0800_0000 => 0x00_C800_0000
> + */
> + ranges = <0x02000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0xc0000000 0x00000000 0x08000000>,
> + <0x02000000 0x00000000 0x08000000 0x00000000 0xc8000000 0x00000000 0x08000000>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-map-mask = <0xf800 0 0 7>;
> + interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &intc 47 3
> + 0 0 0 2 &intc 48 3
> + 0 0 0 3 &intc 49 3
> + 0 0 0 4 &intc 50 3>;
> + clocks = <&pcie0>;
> + clock-names = "pcie";
> + brcm,ssc;
> + brcm,log2-scb-sizes = <0x1e 0x1e 0x1e>;
> + vreg-wifi-pwr-supply-names = "vreg-wifi-pwr";
> + vreg-wifi-pwr-supply = <&vreg-wifi-pwr>;
The supply for the PCIE RC is called "vreg-wifi-pwr"? Seems a bit
strange.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-05 19:14 [PATCH v2 0/2] pci: host: Broadcom STB PCIE RC controller support Florian Fainelli
2016-05-05 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: DT: bindings: Add Broadcom STB PCIe bindings Florian Fainelli
2016-05-05 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-05 21:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-05-09 13:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-10 17:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-05-10 19:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-09 19:26 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2016-05-09 23:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-05-09 23:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-05-11 14:45 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2016-05-17 1:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-05-05 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pci: host: Add Broadcom STB PCIE RC controller Florian Fainelli
2016-05-11 14:47 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2016-05-17 1:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-06-09 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] pci: host: Broadcom STB PCIE RC controller support Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509192641.GA4936@rob-hp-laptop \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox