From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:34:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: secondary_start_kernel: Remove unnecessary barrier In-Reply-To: <1462875281-5063-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> References: <1462875281-5063-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160510103400.GG687@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:14:41AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Remove the unnecessary smp_wmb(), which was added to make sure > that the update_cpu_boot_status() completes before we mark the > CPU online. But update_cpu_boot_status() already has dsb() (required > for the failing CPUs) to ensure the correct behavior. > > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Dennis Chen > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose Acked-by: Mark Rutland Mark. > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > index b2d5f4e..ec040a8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > @@ -225,8 +225,6 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void) > pr_info("CPU%u: Booted secondary processor [%08x]\n", > cpu, read_cpuid_id()); > update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_BOOT_SUCCESS); > - /* Make sure the status update is visible before we complete */ > - smp_wmb(); > set_cpu_online(cpu, true); > complete(&cpu_running); > > -- > 1.7.9.5 >