[PATCH] sched/core: don't include asm/mmu_context from drivers

[linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:46:56PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:52:32 +0200
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> >> This reverts the earlier fix attempt and works around the problem
> >> by including both linux/mmu_context.h and asm/mmu_context.h from
> >> kernel/sched/core.c. This is not a good solution but seems less
> >> hacky than the alternatives.
> >
> > What about simply not compiling finish_arch_post_lock_switch() when
> > building modules?
> >
> > (untested, not compiled or anything)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> > index fa5b42d44985..3f22d1b6bac8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> > @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >                 cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
> >  }
> >
> > +#ifndef MODULE
> >  #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
> >         finish_arch_post_lock_switch
> >  static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
> > @@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
> >                 preempt_enable_no_resched();
> >         }
> >  }
> > +#endif /* !MODULE */
> >
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> >
> 
> 
> Can someone in arm land ack this so Ingo can apply it?

Sorry, I'm simply unable to read every message that comes in.

Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.