From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:04:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] pwm: atmel-hlcdc: Fix default PWM polarity In-Reply-To: <20160517110005.GA26166@ulmo.ba.sec> References: <1463476352-7485-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20160517110005.GA26166@ulmo.ba.sec> Message-ID: <20160517130409.0670a94f@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 17 May 2016 13:00:05 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > The PWM device exposed by the HLCDC IP is configured with an inverted > > polarity by default. Registering the PWM chip with the normal polarity > > was not a problem before commit 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core > > infrastructure to allow atomic updates") because the ->set_polarity() > > hook was called no matter the current polarity state, but this is no longer > > the case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > Fixes: 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates") > > That's not technically correct, because it's the driver that has the > bug. The core change merely exposes it. Agree. > How about if I sort this into > the pwm-atomic branch and reword the commit message accordingly? That > way things should all stay bisectible. As you wish. > > Then again, given the breakage caused by the pwm_args patch I suppose > it doesn't matter much because that's part of a stable branch that I > can't rebase. Yep, I know :-(. -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com