linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] KVM: arm/arm64: Add VGICv3 save/restore API documentation
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 16:11:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160520141106.GA10370@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5735ED2F.4030104@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

[turns out I did have a few questions]

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 13/05/16 15:43, Christoffer Dall wrote:

[...]

> > +
> > +  KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS
> > +  Attributes:
> > +    The attr field of kvm_device_attr encodes two values:
> > +    bits:     | 63      ....       32 | 31  ....  16 | 15  ....  0 |
> > +    values:   |         mpidr         |      RES     |    instr    |
> > +
> > +    The mpidr field encodes the CPU ID based on the affinity information in the
> > +    architecture defined MPIDR, and the field is encoded as follows:
> > +      | 63 .... 56 | 55 .... 48 | 47 .... 40 | 39 .... 32 |
> > +      |    Aff3    |    Aff2    |    Aff1    |    Aff0   |
> > +
> > +    The instr field encodes the system register to access based on the fields
> > +    defined in the A64 instruction set encoding for system register access
> > +    (RES means the bits are reserved for future use and should be zero):
> 
> Should we call this field RES0 in order to match the various
> architecture documents?
> 

I define this below, so I don't think this is hugely important.  If you
think it clarifies things, I can fix it.

> > +
> > +      | 15 ... 14 | 13 ... 11 | 10 ... 7 | 6 ... 3 | 2 ... 0 |
> > +      |   Op 0    |    Op1    |    CRn   |   CRm   |   Op2   |
> > +
> > +    All system regs accessed through this API are (rw, 64-bit) and
> > +    kvm_device_attr.addr points to a __u64 value.
> > +
> > +    KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS accesses the CPU interface registers for the
> > +    CPU specified by the mpidr field.
> > +
> > +
> > +  Limitations:
> > +    - Priorities are not implemented, and registers are RAZ/WI
> 
> Is that still true? We should also document the lack of Group0 support.
> 

The priorities limiation must go out.  Not sure why we need to document
the lack of Group0 support on the user api?  Isn't that a strictly
internal limitation, but unlrelated to getting/setting the userspace
state?


Thanks,
-Christoffer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-20 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-13 14:43 [PATCH v3] KVM: arm/arm64: Add VGICv3 save/restore API documentation Christoffer Dall
2016-05-13 15:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-18 17:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-05-20 14:11   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2016-05-13 15:28 ` Peter Maydell
2016-05-18 17:03   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-05-19 10:44     ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160520141106.GA10370@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).