From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:42:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: dts: r8a7796: Add Renesas R8A7796 SoC
 support
In-Reply-To: <5742B66C.7080102@rvc.renesas.com>
References: <1463966906-15129-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
 <1463966906-15129-2-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
 <CAMuHMdXsu=O13rLysob1Xp+5vWcp7gq6byCffR-6hGc+W-837A@mail.gmail.com>
 <5742B66C.7080102@rvc.renesas.com>
Message-ID: <20160524014249.GA22751@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 02:51:08PM +0700, Khiem Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Simon, Geert,
> 
> On 5/23/2016 2:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Simon Horman
> ><horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >>Basic support for the Gen 3 R-Car M3-W SoC.
> >>
> >>Based on work for the r8a7795 and r8a7796 SoCs by
> >>Takeshi Kihara, Dirk Behme and Geert Uytterhoeven.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> >
> >>--- /dev/null
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi
> >>@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
> >>+       psci {
> >>+               compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> >
> >Do we want to use 1.0 on r8a7795, too?
> 
> I think we should apply same setting as r8a7795.
> i.e compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";
> 
> Using 1.0 will open Suspend-to-RAM support if secure firmware supports that
> feature.
> However, we might need additional work in drivers to support suspend/resume
> handlers.
> So, I suggest that we keep using 0.2 until Suspend-to-RAM feature is
> confirmed in r8a7795/r8a7796.

Sure, I will use 0.2.