From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 19:09:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix the wrong comment In-Reply-To: <1464574369-22618-1-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com> References: <1464574369-22618-1-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160602180948.GE7697@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > Currently, we use the 48-bit for the kernel and user by default. > The comment becomes stale. This patch fixes the wrong comment. > > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie > --- > arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S > index c431787..421386759 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S > @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ ENTRY(__cpu_setup) > bic x0, x0, x5 // clear bits > orr x0, x0, x6 // set bits > /* > - * Set/prepare TCR and TTBR. We use 512GB (39-bit) address range for > - * both user and kernel. > + * Set/prepare TCR. We use VA_BITS of address range for both > + * kernel and user. > */ To be honest, all three of these comments (including the two in the context) are totally useless. Can we just remove them instead? Will