linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: b-liu@ti.com (Bin Liu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:04:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160603130454.GA3778@uda0271908> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88cada17-af4c-9548-e734-351b6695e30f@redhat.com>

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:34:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 02-06-16 20:16, Bin Liu wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Some SoCs have a single phy-hw-block with multiple phys, this is
> >>modelled by a single phy dts node, so we end up with multiple
> >>controller nodes with a phys property pointing to the phy-node
> >>of the otg-phy.
> >>
> >>Only one of these controllers typically is an otg controller, yet we
> >
> >Is it guaranteed that only one of them will be otg?
> 
> I guess not, but if there are 2 then with my patch we are of no worse
> then today, we will then pick the first otg controller. Whereas

What if the first otg controller is not what we want? this patch does
not solve the problem. I would think Kishon's suggestion in another
email - seperate dt phy nodes - is a better option.

> of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy currently is broken even on setups with
> a shared phy dt-node and only 1 otg controller, which are quite
> common.

If that is the case, the model has to be changed. Otherwise, a single
phy driver is unable to handle different operations from multiple
controllers.

Regards,
-Bin.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-03 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-02 17:31 [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] phy-sun4i-usb: Add support for peripheral-only mode Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] phy-sun4i-usb: Add workaround for missing Vbus det interrupts on A31 Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] musb: sunxi: Simplify dr_mode handling Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block Bin Liu
2016-06-03 10:34   ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:04     ` Bin Liu [this message]
2016-06-03 13:09       ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 11:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-03 11:39   ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:12     ` Bin Liu
2016-06-03 13:15       ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160603130454.GA3778@uda0271908 \
    --to=b-liu@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).