From: b-liu@ti.com (Bin Liu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:12:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160603131213.GB3778@uda0271908> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8b770aa-5642-93c3-60c8-0717e87e732e@redhat.com>
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:39:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03-06-16 13:20, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Thursday 02 June 2016 11:01 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Some SoCs have a single phy-hw-block with multiple phys, this is
> >>modelled by a single phy dts node, so we end up with multiple
> >>controller nodes with a phys property pointing to the phy-node
> >>of the otg-phy.
> >
> >Maybe we should try to model each phy with a separate dt node?
>
> That seems like making things unnecessarily complicated. If we want
> to be 100% sure that of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy finds the right
I believe we have to.
> controller, we could add an "int index" parameter to of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy
> and make it check that first argument specified to the phandle
> used in the controller node matches the passed in index.
Why we need the 'index'? Once the dt has seperate nodes for the phys,
'phy_np' passed in is the uniqe id of the phy node.
>
> And use index == -1 to skip this test.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
Regards,
-Bin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-03 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 17:31 [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] phy-sun4i-usb: Add support for peripheral-only mode Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] phy-sun4i-usb: Add workaround for missing Vbus det interrupts on A31 Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] musb: sunxi: Simplify dr_mode handling Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block Bin Liu
2016-06-03 10:34 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:04 ` Bin Liu
2016-06-03 13:09 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 11:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-03 11:39 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:12 ` Bin Liu [this message]
2016-06-03 13:15 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160603131213.GB3778@uda0271908 \
--to=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).