From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:30:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Implement ptep_set_access_flags() for hardware AF/DBM In-Reply-To: <4c2b3cff-d4a7-f3b8-ef0d-f6caa21f412e@suse.de> References: <1460559682-31267-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <4c2b3cff-d4a7-f3b8-ef0d-f6caa21f412e@suse.de> Message-ID: <20160607163024.GB20477@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Alex, Thanks for the bug report. On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:13:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 13.04.16 17:01, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > When hardware updates of the access and dirty states are enabled, the > > default ptep_set_access_flags() implementation based on calling > > set_pte_at() directly is potentially racy. This triggers the "racy dirty > > state clearing" warning in set_pte_at() because an existing writable PTE > > is overridden with a clean entry. [...] > This patch breaks swapping for me. > > I've hit weird issues where systems stopped working half-way, with the > kernel still being fine and user space applications just stopping to > respond. > > After some debugging we found out that it always happens when swapping > (to anything, backing storage doesn't matter). A quick bisect points to > this commit as culprit and indeed, if I disable CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM > the system works as expected. [...] > The back traces indicate that the page fault handler goes through and > the process just keeps banging on the same page fault over and over > again. I have not yet figured out what *exactly* is going wrong or why > this patch would actually give us that effect. > > I was able to fully reproduce the issue with current Linus tree (4.7-rc2+). It looks like the following happens: 1. We put down a PTE_WRITE | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_AF pte 2. Memory pressure -> pte_mkold(pte) -> clear PTE_AF 3. A read faults due to the missing access flag 4. ptep_set_access_flags is called with dirty = 0, due to the read fault 5. pte is then made PTE_WRITE | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_AF | PTE_RDONLY (!) 6. A write faults, but pte_write is true so we get stuck Does the diff below fix the issue for you? If so, I'll write a proper patch. Cheers, Will --->8 diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index 5954881a35ac..ba3fc12bd272 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ int ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, * PTE_RDONLY is cleared by default in the asm below, so set it in * back if necessary (read-only or clean PTE). */ - if (!pte_write(entry) || !dirty) + if (!pte_write(entry) || !pte_sw_dirty(entry)) pte_val(entry) |= PTE_RDONLY; /*