linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:24:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160609132408.GA16831@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461069013-13292-4-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:30:11PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Inorder to accomodate bot DT and ACPI LPI support in psci_cpu_init_idle,
> move the device tree specific into psci_dt_cpu_init_idle.
> 
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index 11bfee8b79a9..af6c5c839568 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ static int __init psci_features(u32 psci_func_id)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state);
>  
> -static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
> +static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)

Unfortunately you would break ARM 32-bit if you did that.

>  {
>  	int i, ret, count = 0;
>  	u32 *psci_states;
> -	struct device_node *state_node;
> +	struct device_node *state_node, *cpu_node;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized
> @@ -263,6 +263,10 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>  	if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> +	cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> +	if (!cpu_node)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	/* Count idle states */
>  	while ((state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states",
>  					      count))) {
> @@ -303,27 +307,18 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>  	}
>  	/* Idle states parsed correctly, initialize per-cpu pointer */
>  	per_cpu(psci_power_state, cpu) = psci_states;
> +	of_node_put(cpu_node);
>  	return 0;
>  
>  free_mem:
> +	of_node_put(cpu_node);
>  	kfree(psci_states);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  int psci_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *cpu_node;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> -	if (!cpu_node)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu_node, cpu);
> -
> -	of_node_put(cpu_node);
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu);

How about leaving code as is and you wrap the cpu_node retrieval:

if (!acpi_disabled) {
	acpi_idle_init();
} else {
	cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
	if (!cpu_node)
		return -ENODEV;

	ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu_node, cpu);

	of_node_put(cpu_node);
}

?

Alternatively, you could create an intermediate stub
__psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(), that will be used for CONFIG_ARM
cpuidle_ops.init and psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() after retrieving
the cpu_node, which I think is slightly cleaner.

Lorenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-09 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-19 12:30 [PATCH v4 0/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:49   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 13:00     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20  9:56   ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20 10:09     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-10  0:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:07     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla
2016-05-10  0:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11  0:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:06     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 20:45       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-06-09 13:24   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-06-09 14:26     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 13:59   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 15:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20  9:59   ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20 10:20     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 10:39   ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-04-26 15:51   ` Prakash, Prashanth
2016-04-26 16:01     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11  0:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:06     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64 Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160609132408.GA16831@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).