From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:39:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 08/20] pwm: Add PWM Capture support In-Reply-To: <20160610143854.GE1537@dell> References: <20160608092135.21184-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160608092135.21184-9-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160610135302.GK27142@ulmo.ba.sec> <20160610143854.GE1537@dell> Message-ID: <20160610163956.GA8696@ulmo.ba.sec> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:38:54PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:23AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Supply a PWM Capture call-back Op in order to pass back > > > information obtained by running analysis on PWM a signal. > > > This would normally (at least during testing) be called from > > > the Sysfs routines with a view to printing out PWM Capture > > > data which has been encoded into a string. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > > --- > > > drivers/pwm/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/pwm.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+) > > So do you want me to re-spin? > > Before you said you'd make adjustments on patches 8 through 10, so I'm > a little confused. Yeah, I only realized that it might be quicker to make these adjustments myself when I had finished looking at patch 10. I've pushed the adjusted patches to a for-4.8/pwm-capture branch, so if you're going to re-spin the remainder of the patches, perhaps that could be your base? https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git/log/?h=for-4.8/pwm-capture If you don't have any objections I can put those into linux-next early next week. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: