From: b-liu@ti.com (Bin Liu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:34:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610183450.GD28283@uda0271908> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c86faf8-85a9-fab5-d67d-672508b39a6f@redhat.com>
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 08:27:03PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-06-16 17:00, Bin Liu wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:46:25AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Some SoCs have a single phy-hw-block with multiple phys, this is
> >>modelled by a single phy dts node, so we end up with multiple
> >>controller nodes with a phys property pointing to the phy-node
> >>of the otg-phy.
> >>
> >>Only one of these controllers typically is an otg controller, yet we
> >>were checking the first controller who uses a phy from the block and
> >>then end up looking for a dr_mode property in e.g. the ehci controller.
> >>
> >>This commit fixes this by adding an arg0 parameter to
> >>of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy and make of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy
> >>check that this matches the phandle args[0] value when looking for
> >>the otg controller.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >>---
> >>Changes in v2:
> >>-Add a arg0 parameter instead of looking for nodes with a dr_mode property
> >>Changes in v3:
> >>-No changes
> >>Changes in v4:
> >>-When arg0 == -1, use of_parse_phandle instead of of_parse_phandle_with_args
> >> because using of_parse_phandle_with_args breaks phy's which use the usb-phy
> >> bindings instead of the generic phy bindings
> >
> >I would think you'd better send this patch with --in-reply-to to the
> >patch in v3, so whoever picks it can easily pick the whole patch set,
> >especially in this case the set touches multiple modules, and you don't
> >want to resend the other patches.
>
> Does that mean that you're happy with this patch now ? If so can I have
> your Acked-by please ? Then I'll resend the entire set after that.
Yes, the patch looks good to me, but I am not sure I should 'Acked-by'
since I am not the maintainer of it.
BTY, since we are here, please change the patch 4/4 subject prefix to
'usb: musb: sunxi: ...' when you resend, I noticed it after I Acked-by.
Regards,
-Bin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-10 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 9:46 [PATCH v4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block Hans de Goede
2016-06-10 15:00 ` Bin Liu
2016-06-10 18:27 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-10 18:34 ` Bin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160610183450.GD28283@uda0271908 \
--to=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).