From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] crypto: marvell: Adding load balancing between engines
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:13:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615231315.5e254706@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466018134-10779-7-git-send-email-romain.perier@free-electrons.com>
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:15:33 +0200
Romain Perier <romain.perier@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> This commits adds support for fine grained load balancing on
> multi-engine IPs. The engine is pre-selected based on its current load
> and on the weight of the crypto request that is about to be processed.
> The global crypto queue is also moved to each engine. These changes are
to the mv_cesa_engine object.
> useful for preparing the code to support TDMA chaining between crypto
> requests, because each tdma chain will be handled per engine.
These changes are required to allow chaining crypto requests at the DMA
level.
> By using
> a crypto queue per engine, we make sure that we keep the state of the
> tdma chain synchronized with the crypto queue. We also reduce contention
> on 'cesa_dev->lock' and improve parallelism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/marvell/cesa.c | 30 +++++++++----------
> drivers/crypto/marvell/cesa.h | 26 +++++++++++++++--
> drivers/crypto/marvell/cipher.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/cipher.c
> index fbaae2f..02aa38f 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/cipher.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/cipher.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ static void mv_cesa_ablkcipher_std_step(struct ablkcipher_request *req)
> size_t len = min_t(size_t, req->nbytes - sreq->offset,
> CESA_SA_SRAM_PAYLOAD_SIZE);
>
> + mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, &sreq->op);
> + memcpy_toio(engine->sram, &sreq->op, sizeof(sreq->op));
> +
> len = sg_pcopy_to_buffer(req->src, creq->src_nents,
> engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
> len, sreq->offset);
> @@ -167,12 +170,9 @@ mv_cesa_ablkcipher_std_prepare(struct ablkcipher_request *req)
> {
> struct mv_cesa_ablkcipher_req *creq = ablkcipher_request_ctx(req);
> struct mv_cesa_ablkcipher_std_req *sreq = &creq->req.std;
> - struct mv_cesa_engine *engine = sreq->base.engine;
>
> sreq->size = 0;
> sreq->offset = 0;
> - mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, &sreq->op);
> - memcpy_toio(engine->sram, &sreq->op, sizeof(sreq->op));
Are these changes really related to this load balancing support?
AFAICT, it's something that could have been done earlier, and is not
dependent on the changes your introducing here, but maybe I'm missing
something.
> }
[...]
> static int mv_cesa_ecb_aes_encrypt(struct ablkcipher_request *req)
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> index f7f84cc..5946a69 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,15 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_step(struct ahash_request *req)
> unsigned int new_cache_ptr = 0;
> u32 frag_mode;
> size_t len;
> + unsigned int digsize;
> + int i;
> +
> + mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, &creq->op_tmpl);
> + memcpy_toio(engine->sram, &creq->op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl));
> +
> + digsize = crypto_ahash_digestsize(crypto_ahash_reqtfm(req));
> + for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++)
> + writel_relaxed(creq->state[i], engine->regs + CESA_IVDIG(i));
>
> if (creq->cache_ptr)
> memcpy_toio(engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
> @@ -265,11 +274,8 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_prepare(struct ahash_request *req)
> {
> struct mv_cesa_ahash_req *creq = ahash_request_ctx(req);
> struct mv_cesa_ahash_std_req *sreq = &creq->req.std;
> - struct mv_cesa_engine *engine = sreq->base.engine;
>
> sreq->offset = 0;
> - mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, &creq->op_tmpl);
> - memcpy_toio(engine->sram, &creq->op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl));
Same as above: it doesn't seem related to the load balancing stuff.
> }
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-15 19:15 [PATCH 0/7] Chain crypto requests together at the DMA level Romain Perier
2016-06-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/7] crypto: marvell: Add a macro constant for the size of the crypto queue Romain Perier
2016-06-15 19:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] crypto: marvell: Check engine is not already running when enabling a req Romain Perier
2016-06-15 19:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-16 8:18 ` Romain Perier
2016-06-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] crypto: marvell: Copy IV vectors by DMA transfers for acipher requests Romain Perier
2016-06-15 20:07 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-16 8:29 ` Romain Perier
2016-06-16 8:32 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-06-15 20:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] crypto: marvell: Moving the tdma chain out of mv_cesa_tdma_req Romain Perier
2016-06-15 20:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-16 12:02 ` Romain Perier
2016-06-16 12:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-16 12:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] crypto: marvell: Adding a complete operation for async requests Romain Perier
2016-06-15 20:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-16 13:41 ` Romain Perier
2016-06-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] crypto: marvell: Adding load balancing between engines Romain Perier
2016-06-15 21:13 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-06-16 13:44 ` Romain Perier
2016-06-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] crypto: marvell: Add support for chaining crypto requests in TDMA mode Romain Perier
2016-06-15 21:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-17 9:54 ` Romain Perier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160615231315.5e254706@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox