From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:42:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: utilite-pro: add mmc card slot support
In-Reply-To: <2160fa6084b94c839b339a663334ae65@rwthex-s1-b.rwth-ad.de>
References: <20160612232456.1621-1-christopher.spinrath@rwth-aachen.de>
 <c25d8e5d113240c5ab78771f301d901a@rwthex-s1-b.rwth-ad.de>
 <089d827c9de9426eab79a907a2043828@rwthex-s1-a.rwth-ad.de>
 <712bda47d095416f8b69f4eecbf979a5@rwthex-s1-b.rwth-ad.de>
 <575994a0ec924e2db7282a2945d3355f@rwthex-s2-b.rwth-ad.de>
 <2160fa6084b94c839b339a663334ae65@rwthex-s1-b.rwth-ad.de>
Message-ID: <20160616014232.GQ20243@tiger>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:40:26PM +0200, Christopher Spinrath wrote:
> >> Well, my board has revision 1.0. So I cannot test that and feel uneasy
> >> to put my Signed-off-by under such a patch. IMHO the best solution would
> >> be that someone with a revision >= 1.3 board sends a follow-up patch
> >> adding the cd-gpios.

This approach seems reasonable to me, so I just went ahead to apply the
patch, and wait a follow-up patch from someone who can test on 1.3 board.

> >>
> >> If I resend the patch with cd-gpios could you test it and provide a
> >> Tested-By?
> > 
> > Yes. Absolutely.
> > 
> 
> Can we have your opinion on that matter?

Shawn