public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] spi: do not fail if the CS line is not connected
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:28:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160617122803.GN26099@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160617113622.GA10760@jack.zhora.eu>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:36:22PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:

> > > In this case do not fail and defer to the SPI device drivers the
> > > responsibility to check whether the num-cs is '0'.

> > A SPI controller always has one chip seelct, it may not be controllable
> > but it's at least logically present.

> This is true, but there are cases where the CS is not connected
> and this case needs to be treated separately to allow the device
> to work.

In what way?  It is just as easy for a device with no physical chip
select to have a logical chip select of 0 that it does nothing with as
it is for that device to handle any other number.

> This is the case of:

> ./drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx-psc.c:391: master->num_chipselect = 255;
> ./drivers/spi/spi-oc-tiny.c:256:        master->num_chipselect = 255;

> ./drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c:64:              .num_chipselect = -1,
> ./drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835aux.c:436:     master->num_chipselect = -1;

These need fixing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160617/04fd2797/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-17 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-17  7:57 [PATCH 0/5] SPI CS line logical change and s3c64xx code rework Andi Shyti
2016-06-17  7:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] spi: do not fail if the CS line is not connected Andi Shyti
2016-06-17 10:47   ` Mark Brown
2016-06-17 11:36     ` Andi Shyti
2016-06-17 12:28       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-06-19  6:09         ` Andi Shyti
2016-06-26 12:48           ` Mark Brown
2016-06-27 10:57             ` Andi Shyti
2016-06-27 13:06               ` Mark Brown
2016-06-27 14:08                 ` Andi Shyti
2016-06-17  7:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] spi: s3c64xx: group the CS signalling writes in a single function Andi Shyti
2016-06-30 12:15   ` Applied "spi: s3c64xx: group the CS signalling writes in a single function" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2016-06-17  7:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] spi: s3c64xx: consider the case where the CS line is not connected Andi Shyti
2016-06-17  7:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] spi: s3c64xx: do not configure the device twice Andi Shyti
2016-06-30 12:15   ` Applied "spi: s3c64xx: do not configure the device twice" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2016-06-17  7:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] spi: s3c63xx: simplify if statement in prepare_transfer function Andi Shyti
2016-06-30 12:15   ` Applied "spi: s3c64xx: simplify if statement in prepare_transfer function" to the spi tree Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160617122803.GN26099@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox