From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:09:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Kill ESR_LNX_EXEC
In-Reply-To: <1464694383-31700-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
References: <1464694383-31700-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20160621160908.GF14542@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:33:00PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently we (ab)use a reserved bit in ESR_ELx for our own purposes as
> ESR_LNX_EXEC, which isn't ideal, especially as we're inconsistent with our
> mnemonic usage. This series removes ESR_LNX_EXEC entirely, avoiding (ab)use of
> reserved ESR_ELx bits, and makes things a little more consistent.
> 
> I've extracted this from my entry-deasm branch [1], and rebased to v4.7-rc1.
> I've split the KVM changes as the KVM code is undergoing rapid change these
> days, and it should be possible to take those as a subsequent cleanup rather
> than forcing a painful merging process.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/entry-deasm
> 
> 
> Mark Rutland (3):
>   arm64: add macro to extract ESR_ELx.EC
>   arm64/kvm: use ESR_ELx_EC to extract EC
>   arm64: kill ESR_LNX_EXEC

I queued these 3 patches for 4.8. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin