[PATCH v8 4/4] serial: pl011: add console matching function

Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-06-20T15:19:14Z

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:26:39PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2016 09:02 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >
> > On 05/20/2016 04:03 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
>
> Hi Russell,
>
> Can you review this patch please?
>
> Thank you
> Aleksey Makarov
>
> >> This patch adds function pl011_console_match() that implements
> >> method match of struct console. It allows to match consoles against
> >> data specified in a string, for example taken from command line or
> >> compiled by ACPI SPCR table handler.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
> >
> > Hi Greg, Russell,
> >
> > Can you review this patch and consider ACKing it please?
> > It had an ACK from Greg in v7 but since then I changed it a bit.
> >
> > The patch by Christopher Covington [1] specifies that SBSA uart
> > does 32-bit access to registers and this breaks the match function.
> > In this series the function was changed to match when SPCR specifies
> > both mmio32 and mmio access. I removed Acked-by: Greg from this
> > patch because of these changes.
> >
> > The difference between v7 and v8:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > index 4139b64..388edc8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > @@ -2328,10 +2329,10 @@ static int __init pl011_console_match(struct console *co, char *name, int idx,
> >
> > port = &amba_ports[i]->port;
> >
> > - if (port->iotype != iotype)
> > + if (iotype != UPIO_MEM && iotype != UPIO_MEM32)
> > continue;
> > - if ((iotype == UPIO_MEM || iotype == UPIO_MEM32) &&
> > - (port->mapbase != addr))
> > +
> > + if (port->mapbase != addr)
> > continue;
> >
> > co->index = i;

I'm looking at this change, and I don't know what effect it ultimately
has. This is kind of a problem, because I've zero knowledge of ACPI,
and so I can't say whether this change is appropriate or not. I have
no ARM server platforms (yet), nor any access to them, so I can't even
try it out.

In short, I've no idea. I guess it's up to those who have come up
with SBSA to decide whether this is an appropriate change or not.

--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.