[PATCH v8 4/4] serial: pl011: add console matching function

Graeme Gregory
2016-08-03T08:33:51Z

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:19:14PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:26:39PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >
> > On 06/02/2016 09:02 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/20/2016 04:03 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > Can you review this patch please?
> >
> > Thank you
> > Aleksey Makarov
> >
> > >> This patch adds function pl011_console_match() that implements
> > >> method match of struct console. It allows to match consoles against
> > >> data specified in a string, for example taken from command line or
> > >> compiled by ACPI SPCR table handler.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
> > >
> > > Hi Greg, Russell,
> > >
> > > Can you review this patch and consider ACKing it please?
> > > It had an ACK from Greg in v7 but since then I changed it a bit.
> > >
> > > The patch by Christopher Covington [1] specifies that SBSA uart
> > > does 32-bit access to registers and this breaks the match function.
> > > In this series the function was changed to match when SPCR specifies
> > > both mmio32 and mmio access. I removed Acked-by: Greg from this
> > > patch because of these changes.
> > >
> > > The difference between v7 and v8:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > > index 4139b64..388edc8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > > @@ -2328,10 +2329,10 @@ static int __init pl011_console_match(struct console *co, char *name, int idx,
> > >
> > > port = &amba_ports[i]->port;
> > >
> > > - if (port->iotype != iotype)
> > > + if (iotype != UPIO_MEM && iotype != UPIO_MEM32)
> > > continue;
> > > - if ((iotype == UPIO_MEM || iotype == UPIO_MEM32) &&
> > > - (port->mapbase != addr))
> > > +
> > > + if (port->mapbase != addr)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > co->index = i;
>
> I'm looking at this change, and I don't know what effect it ultimately
> has. This is kind of a problem, because I've zero knowledge of ACPI,
> and so I can't say whether this change is appropriate or not. I have
> no ARM server platforms (yet), nor any access to them, so I can't even
> try it out.
>
> In short, I've no idea. I guess it's up to those who have come up
> with SBSA to decide whether this is an appropriate change or not.
>

Lorenzo, Sudeep, as ARM ACPI maintainers and keepers of SBSA do you have
any comment on this?

Graeme