linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk (Matt Fleming)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/3] x86/UV, x86/efi: Re-factor efi_call_virt for general use
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:44:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160623124433.GE8415@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466017455-236934-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com>

On Wed, 15 Jun, at 02:04:12PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> This patchset creates a general purpose version of the efi_call_virt
> macro that does not assume that the function pointer being passed in is
> inside of efi.systab->runtime.  It also fixes up uv_bios_call to use the
> new functionality, and does a bit of cleanup in the efi_thunk macro.
> 
> Quick breakdown of the patches:
> 
> Patch 1) Move necessary macros to locations where we can access them.
> 	 Remove hard-coded efi.systab reference from efi_call_virt.
> 	 Rename/create new macros as needed.
> Patch 2) Simple change to allow UV code to utilize the new
> 	 functionality.  Included a detailed explanation of how we got
> 	 here.
> Patch 3) Replace a few bits of the efi_thunk macro with the
> 	 arch_efi_call_setup/teardown macros.
> 
> The first two have been tested on simulators and hardware, but the third
> has only been compile-tested.  I don't have any hardware to test that
> on.
> 
> Updates for v2:
> 
> - Fix up arm and arm64 versions of arch_efi_call_virt.  I missed these
>   on my first pass 
> - Add some more detail to the commit message for the uv_bios_call fix.
> - Change the third patch to use the arch_efi_call_setup/teardown macros
>   inside of the efi_thunk macro, instead of replacing efi_thunk entirely
>   for the CONFIG_EFI_MIXED case.

Whole series looks good to me Alex, and everything works fine on my
mixed-mode config. Applied for v4.8, thanks!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15 19:04 [PATCHv2 0/3] x86/UV, x86/efi: Re-factor efi_call_virt for general use Alex Thorlton
2016-06-15 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] Convert efi_call_virt to efi_call_virt_pointer Alex Thorlton
2016-06-15 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] Update uv_bios_call to use efi_call_virt_pointer Alex Thorlton
2016-06-15 19:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] Update efi_thunk to use the the arch_efi_call_virt* macros Alex Thorlton
2016-06-23 12:44 ` Matt Fleming [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160623124433.GE8415@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).