[PATCH v6 2/2] mtd: nand: sunxi: add reset line support

[boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)]

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:20:38 +0800
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> wrote:

> In my opinion, return directly PTR_ERR(nfc->reset) is OK here.
> If devm_reset_control_get_optional() return -EPROBE_DEFER, the code here will also return it. However, if we get other error, why should it return -EPROBE_DEFER again?

Sorry, I just had a brainfart :-). Your implementation is correct.
BTW, can you avoid top-posting and reply inline?

> 
> 24.06.2016, 00:01, "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:48:38 +0800
> > Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> wrote:
> >  
> >> ?The NAND controller on some sun8i chips needs its reset line to be
> >> ?deasserted before they can enter working state.
> >>
> >> ?Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
> >> ?---
> >> ???Changes in v2:
> >> ?????- Corrected the error checking code of reset line.
> >>
> >> ???Changes in v3:
> >> ?????- Corrected a more serious error brought in the "fix" of v2.
> >>
> >> ???Changes in v4:
> >> ?????- Removed unneeded code block after "else".
> >>
> >> ???Changes in v5:
> >> ?????- Added reassertion code in case of initialization error and device
> >> ???????remove.
> >>
> >> ???Changes in v6:
> >> ?????- Fixed a resource leak by not using goto to exit in case of error.
> >>
> >> ??drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> ??1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> ?diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c
> >> ?index a83a690..08d5e88 100644
> >> ?--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c
> >> ?+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c
> >> ?@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> >> ??#include <linux/gpio.h>
> >> ??#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >> ??#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> >> ?+#include <linux/reset.h>
> >>
> >> ??#define NFC_REG_CTL 0x0000
> >> ??#define NFC_REG_ST 0x0004
> >> ?@@ -269,6 +270,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc {
> >> ??????????void __iomem *regs;
> >> ??????????struct clk *ahb_clk;
> >> ??????????struct clk *mod_clk;
> >> ?+ struct reset_control *reset;
> >> ??????????unsigned long assigned_cs;
> >> ??????????unsigned long clk_rate;
> >> ??????????struct list_head chips;
> >> ?@@ -1871,26 +1873,42 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> ??????????if (ret)
> >> ??????????????????goto out_ahb_clk_unprepare;
> >>
> >> ?+ nfc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional(dev, "ahb");
> >> ?+
> >> ?+ if (!IS_ERR(nfc->reset)) {
> >> ?+ ret = reset_control_deassert(nfc->reset);
> >> ?+ if (ret) {
> >> ?+ dev_err(dev, "reset err %d\n", ret);
> >> ?+ goto out_mod_clk_unprepare;
> >> ?+ }
> >> ?+ } else if (PTR_ERR(nfc->reset) != -ENOENT) {
> >> ?+ ret = PTR_ERR(nfc->reset);  
> >
> > You should return -EDEFER_PROBE here.
> >
> > And can you please rebase this series on top of nand/next [1]?
> >
> > [1]https://github.com/linux-nand/linux/tree/nand/next