From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 18:58:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() a bit
 more efficient
In-Reply-To: <20160708105012.GA32305@linaro.org>
References: <1467785755-3488-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
 <1467785755-3488-3-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
 <20160707134628.GB20553@linaro.org>	<20160708141729.3fa61c10@xhacker>
 <20160708105012.GA32305@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20160708185854.22e9fae9@xhacker>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:50:12 +0200 Daniel Lezcano  wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:17:29PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Dear Daniel,
> > 
> > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:46:28 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >   
> > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:15:55PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:  
> > > > Currently, we check cpuidle_ops.suspend every time when entering a
> > > > low-power idle state. But this check could be avoided in this hot path
> > > > by moving it into arm_cpuidle_read_ops() to reduce arm_cpuidle_suspend
> > > > overhead a bit.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> > > > ---    
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>  
> > 
> > I'm not sure the upstream merging path this patch should follow, Per my
> > understanding, I need to put it into Russell's PATCH system.  
> 
> Or alternatively through arm-soc
> 

Got it. thanks.

Dear Arnd, Olof,

I have no pull request permission. what's your preference? Could you please
advise?

Thanks