From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:06:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to use proper unit address In-Reply-To: <20160711095623.GI5823@ulmo.ba.sec> References: <1462291015-1919-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <1462291015-1919-5-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <20160711095623.GI5823@ulmo.ba.sec> Message-ID: <20160711100629.GJ5823@ulmo.ba.sec> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:56:23AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: > > Replace unit address from 0 to the proper physical address. Also insure > > that the unit address matches the reg property address. > > > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > I applied this long ago but never let you know: Applied, thanks. Actually I didn't. And it seems the reason is that it doesn't apply cleanly. For some reason my tree doesn't have an entry for the ecap example on am437x. Am I missing a patch? Can you resend whatever is not in linux-next yet? Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: