From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: van.freenix@gmail.com (Peng Fan) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:24:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] iommu: arm-smmu: use devm_request_irq and devm_free_irq In-Reply-To: <578375D7.7090609@arm.com> References: <1467625102-9755-1-git-send-email-van.freenix@gmail.com> <578375D7.7090609@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160712012412.GA11832@linux-7smt.suse> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Robin, On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:32:55AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >On 04/07/16 10:38, Peng Fan wrote: >> Use devm_request_irq to simplify error handling path, >> when probe smmu device. >> >> Also devm_{request|free}_irq when init or destroy domain context. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan >> Cc: Will Deacon >> Cc: Robin Murphy >> --- >[...] >> @@ -2050,7 +2046,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> dev_err(dev, "removing device with active domains!\n"); >> >> for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_global_irqs; ++i) >> - free_irq(smmu->irqs[i], smmu); >> + devm_free_irq(smmu->dev, smmu->irqs[i], smmu); > >There shouldn't be any need for this at all, since the very next thing >called after drv->remove() is devres_release_all(). Thanks for comments. I'll fix this with a new patch. Thanks, Peng. > >Robin. > >> >> /* Turn the thing off */ >> writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0); >> >