From: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org (Bjorn Andersson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:11:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160713191134.GL23833@tuxbot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462454983-13168-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On Thu 05 May 06:29 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
Lee,
I ran into this topic again while looking into some unrelated things.
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +struct rproc *of_rproc_byindex(struct device_node *np, int index)
> +{
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> + struct device_node *rproc_node;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + struct klist_iter i;
> +
> + if (index < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + rproc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rprocs", index);
> + if (!rproc_node)
As I stated before I would like for you to use the existing rproc_list,
as done in rproc_get_by_phandle() today.
But as you resend this patch, could you please make this check fallback
to also checking for "ti,rproc", then simply drop the existing
rproc_get_by_phandle() and change the call to
of_rproc_byindex(dev->of_node, 0) in wkup_m3_ipc.c?
That way we're backwards compatible with the TI wakeup M3, without
having to maintain the then non-standard generic rproc phandle resolver.
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rproc_node);
> + if (!pdev)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> + klist_iter_init(&rprocs, &i);
> + while ((rproc = next_rproc(&i)) != NULL)
> + if (rproc->dev.parent == &pdev->dev)
> + break;
> + klist_iter_exit(&i);
> +
> + return rproc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_rproc_byindex);
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-13 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-05 13:29 [PATCH 0/5] remoteproc: A few important improvements Lee Jones
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] remoteproc: core: Task sync during rproc_fw_boot() Lee Jones
2016-05-06 18:44 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions Lee Jones
2016-05-06 18:48 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-10 14:16 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-10 18:48 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-07-13 19:11 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2016-07-14 6:53 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] remoteproc: core: Add ability to select a firmware from the client Lee Jones
2016-05-06 18:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-10 13:02 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: core: Supply framework to request, declare and fetch shared memory Lee Jones
2016-05-11 22:30 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-06-15 22:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-06-21 7:33 ` [STLinux Kernel] " loic pallardy
2016-06-22 16:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: core: Clip carveout if it's too big Lee Jones
2016-05-10 19:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-06-17 19:53 ` [STLinux Kernel] " loic pallardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160713191134.GL23833@tuxbot \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).