From: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mach-omap2: remove bogus "or_module" from rx51-peripherals
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:02:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160722140242.GC11410@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160722064101.GW28140@atomide.com>
[Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mach-omap2: remove bogus "or_module" from rx51-peripherals] On 21/07/2016 (Thu 23:41) Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> [160719 21:17]:
> > During unrelated work, attempting to remove an include of the
> > linux/module.h in favour of "struct module;" in order to reduce
> > header entanglement, we found doing so caused a build failure in
> > this file.
>
> We're planning to drop this file after v4.8-rc1 after I've
> verified that legacy booting still works at v4.8-rc1.
>
> Are you OK if I pick this patch into my omap-for-v4.8/legacy
> branch? Or if you have a minimal immutable branch against v4.7-rc1
> with just this patch I can merge it in no problem.
Is the legacy branch a contingency plan for the case where legacy
booting doesn't work? If so, that should be OK.
Having the patch present, or having the file deleted both take care of
my concern -- which was was introducing build regressions when adding
the gpio header cleanup into for-4.9 content.
THanks,
Paul.
--
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 4:13 [PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix three implicit module use cases fed via gpio Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-20 4:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mach-omap2: remove bogus "or_module" from rx51-peripherals Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-22 6:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-07-22 14:02 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2016-07-23 5:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-07-23 14:14 ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-20 4:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: pxa: add module.h for corgi symbol_get/symbol_put usage Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-20 4:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: pxa: add module.h for spitz " Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix three implicit module use cases fed via gpio Linus Walleij
2016-07-23 8:09 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-07-23 14:10 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160722140242.GC11410@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).