From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lina.iyer@linaro.org (Lina Iyer) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:04:54 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 08/14] timer: Export next wake up of a CPU In-Reply-To: References: <1466624209-27432-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> <1466624209-27432-9-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20160727150454.GD1369@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 27 2016 at 03:16 -0600, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Lina Iyer wrote: >> +static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu) >> +{ >> + ktime_t len = { .tv64 = NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ }; >> + >> + /* Next wake up is the tick period, assume it starts now */ >> + return ktime_add(len, ktime_get()); > > return tick_next_period; > >Will tell you the point where the next tick interrupt is due. > That definitely is better, will change. >> +} >> + >> static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; } >> static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; } >> #endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */ >> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c >> index 536ada8..addf3235 100644 >> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c >> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c >> @@ -979,6 +979,19 @@ ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void) >> return ts->sleep_length; >> } >> >> +/** >> + * tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup - return the next wake up of the CPU >> + * >> + * Called with interrupts disabled on the cpu > >So why are you handing in the (undocumented) cpu argument if its called on >that cpu anyway? > Oh, my comment is very misleading. The function may be called from any CPU for any other CPU. It should be more like "Called when the interrupts are disabled on the CPU". I guess that doesn't make sense either. I will remove this comment. Thanks, Lina >> + */ >> +ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu) >> +{ >> + struct clock_event_device *dev = >> + per_cpu(tick_cpu_device.evtdev, cpu); >> + >> + return dev->next_event; > >Then this becomes > > return __this_cpu_read(tick_cpu_device.evtdev)->nextevt; > >Thanks, > > tglx