From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Add support for binary image files
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:31:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728040125.GA27150@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f352dcfc827a4cbb3878dd1043877a4154b1bd08.1469559530.git.geoff@infradead.org>
Hi Geoff,
On 26/07/2016:08:18:57 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
> From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> [Reworked and cleaned up]
You removed page_offset calculation in rework.
I am unable to understand that how arm64_mem.page_offset will be filled up now
for binary image case.
I think, we still need to keep page_offset user input. You may take following
two patches which does this, or you may leave binary image support patch which I
will send after your patches are merged.
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/5b7e49a75d1d6cd4ac846f50ff10275fd54cb545
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/a0ce0ce673755c4061c1f081170a3a75dfa1d1fb
~Pratyush
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> ---
> kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> index 84386f7..cad7c73 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> @@ -24,21 +24,40 @@ int image_arm64_probe(const char *kernel_buf, off_t kernel_size)
> return -1;
> }
>
> - fprintf(stderr, "kexec: ARM64 binary image files are currently NOT SUPPORTED.\n");
> -
> - return -1;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int image_arm64_load(int argc, char **argv, const char *kernel_buf,
> off_t kernel_size, struct kexec_info *info)
> {
> - return -EFAILED;
> + const struct arm64_image_header *h;
> + unsigned long image_base;
> +
> + h = (const struct arm64_image_header *)(kernel_buf);
> +
> + if (arm64_process_image_header(h))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dbgprintf("%s: text_offset: %016lx\n", __func__,
> + arm64_mem.text_offset);
> + dbgprintf("%s: image_size: %016lx\n", __func__,
> + arm64_mem.image_size);
> + dbgprintf("%s: phys_offset: %016lx\n", __func__,
> + arm64_mem.phys_offset);
> + dbgprintf("%s: PE format: %s\n", __func__,
> + (arm64_header_check_pe_sig(h) ? "yes" : "no"));
> +
> + image_base = get_phys_offset() + arm64_mem.text_offset;
> +
> + add_segment_phys_virt(info, kernel_buf, kernel_size, image_base,
> + arm64_mem.image_size, 0);
> +
> + return arm64_load_other_segments(info, image_base);
> }
>
> void image_arm64_usage(void)
> {
> printf(
> " An ARM64 binary image, compressed or not, big or little endian.\n"
> -" Typically an Image, Image.gz or Image.lzma file.\n"
> -" This file type is currently NOT SUPPORTED.\n\n");
> +" Typically an Image, Image.gz or Image.lzma file.\n\n");
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-28 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 20:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64 kexec-tools patches Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] kexec: Add common device tree routines Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kexec: (bugfix) calc correct end address of memory ranges in device tree Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Add support for binary image files Geoff Levand
2016-07-28 4:01 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2016-07-28 18:04 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29 3:35 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-29 17:02 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29 17:15 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-29 17:19 ` Geoff Levand
2016-08-04 4:51 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-08-04 5:11 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Add arm64 kexec support Geoff Levand
2016-07-28 4:10 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-28 17:33 ` Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160728040125.GA27150@localhost.localdomain \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).