From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:39:36 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] mmc: sunxi: sun4i / sun5i do not have sample clocks In-Reply-To: <1469888748-26085-5-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <1469888748-26085-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1469888748-26085-5-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20160801163936.GA26855@rob-hp-laptop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 04:25:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > It turns out that sun4i (A10) and sun5i (A13 & co) do not have sample > clocks, so add a new sun7i-a20-mmc compatible and do not try to use > sample clocks on sun4i / sun5i. > > Since sun4i / sun5i do not have sample clocks, they cannot (reliably) do > DDR rates, so only set MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR when we do have sample clks. > > Note this patch leaves the clk_prepare_enable() / clk_disable_unprepare() > calls to the sample clks as-is, without adding checks for them being > NULL. All the clk_foo calls accept a NULL clk and will return success when > called with a NULL clk. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > --- > Changes in v2: > -Add a new sun7i-a20-compatible for SoCs with sample clks, rather then > making them optional > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sunxi-mmc.txt | 6 +++- I find the subject a bit strange as it should describe the change, not the problem. Otherwise, Acked-by: Rob Herring > drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++------- > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)