From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:21:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/9] remoteproc: core: Ensure error message is clear In-Reply-To: <20160804092153.23032-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <20160804092153.23032-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20160804092153.23032-2-lee.jones@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Before this patch, the dma_alloc_coherent() failure path printed out: "dma_alloc_coherent err: 16760832" ... alluding to the Linux error code being 16760832, but seeing as Linux error codes are all negative, this looks like a signed/unsigned issue. In fact, the message is trying to print the length of the requested memory region. Let's clear that up. While we're at it, let's standardise the way 'len' is printed. In all other locations 'len' is in hex prefixed by a '0x' for clarity. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index aea29a75c..3566dc9 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc, return -EINVAL; } - dev_dbg(dev, "carveout rsc: da %x, pa %x, len %x, flags %x\n", + dev_dbg(dev, "carveout rsc: da %x, pa %x, len 0x%x, flags %x\n", rsc->da, rsc->pa, rsc->len, rsc->flags); carveout = kzalloc(sizeof(*carveout), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -590,7 +590,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc, va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->parent, rsc->len, &dma, GFP_KERNEL); if (!va) { - dev_err(dev->parent, "dma_alloc_coherent err: %d\n", rsc->len); + dev_err(dev->parent, + "failed to allocate dma memory: len 0x%x\n", rsc->len); ret = -ENOMEM; goto free_carv; } -- 2.9.0