From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bp@suse.de (Borislav Petkov) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:30:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v12] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64. In-Reply-To: <20160804094838.GB8093@nazgul.tnic> References: <1469782664-12611-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <20160804094838.GB8093@nazgul.tnic> Message-ID: <20160804103028.GA8152@nazgul.tnic> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Tomasz's linaro address bounces, adding one I've found on lkml to CC instead. On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 04:57:44PM +0800, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote: > > From: Tomasz Nowicki > > > > This commit provides APEI arch-specific bits for aarch64 > > > > Meanwhile, > > (1)add a new subfunction "hest_ia32_init" for > > "acpi_disable_cmcff" which is used by IA-32 Architecture > > Corrected Machine Check (CMC). > > (2)move HEST type (ACPI_HEST_TYPE_IA32_CORRECTED_CHECK) checking to > > a generic place. > > (3)select HAVE_ACPI_APEI when EFI and ACPI is set on ARM64, > > because arch_apei_get_mem_attribute is using efi_mem_attributes on ARM64. > > > > [Fu Wei: improve && upstream] > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki > > Tested-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang > > Signed-off-by: Fu Wei > > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo > > Tested-by: Tyler Baicar > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > --- > > ... > > > @@ -110,8 +111,21 @@ static inline const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu) > > } > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI > > +#define acpi_disable_cmcff 1 > > What does that mean? ARM doesn't have firmware-first mode? > > A piece of comment please. > > > pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr); > > -#endif > > + > > +/* > > + * Despite its name, this function must still broadcast the TLB > > + * invalidation in order to ensure other CPUs don't up with junk > ^ > end > > > + * entries as a result of speculation. Unusually, its also called in > > + * IRQ context (ghes_iounmap_irq) so if we ever need to use IPIs for > > + * TLB broadcasting, then we're in trouble here. > > + */ > > +static inline void arch_apei_flush_tlb_one(unsigned long addr) > > +{ > > + flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE); > > +} > > +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI */ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > > int arm64_acpi_numa_init(void); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c > > index c280df6..ea3046e 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c > > ... > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c > > index 20b3fcf..792a0d9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c > > @@ -232,8 +243,9 @@ void __init acpi_hest_init(void) > > goto err; > > } > > > > - if (!acpi_disable_cmcff) > > - apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL); > > + rc = hest_ia32_init(); > > Why do you need a separate hest_ia32_init() here? > > You can do > > rc = apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL); > > directly here AFAICT. > > > + if (rc) > > + goto err; > > > > if (!ghes_disable) { > > rc = apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_ghes_count, &ghes_count); > > -- > > 2.5.5 > > -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) --