linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hzpeterchen@gmail.com (Peter Chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irqchip: irq-gic: forward SGI to itself for cortex-a7 single core
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:16:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160809031654.GA31105@shlinux2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160808143935.2d946210@arm.com>

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:39:35PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:49:54 +0800
> Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com> wrote:
> 
> +Tony
> 
> > According to Cortex-A7 MPCore TRM, ch8.3.1, Distributor register summary,
> > GICD_ITARGETSRn:
> > 
> > 	The register that contains the SGI and PPI interrupts is
> >        	read-only and the value is implementation defined. For
> >        	Cortex-A7 configurations with only one processor, these
> >        	registers are RAZ/WI.
> > 
> > So, the GICD_ITARGETSR[0..7] is read-only, and the value is 0 for
> > cortex-a7 single core platform if the SoC is cortex-a7 mpcore version.
> > So the cupmask from gic_get_cpumask is 0.
> > 
> > At ARM Generic Interrupt Controller Architecture version 2.0,
> > ch4.3.15 Software Generated Interrupt Register, GICD_SGIR,
> > The distributor will process the requested SGI according to
> > register TargetListFilter and CPUTargetList. At current gic code,
> > it takes TargetListFilter as 0b00, and forward the interrupt to
> > cpumask (variable map at gic_raise_softirq) getting from gic_get_cpumask.
> > but cpumask is 0 according to above explanation for cortex-a7 single core
> > platform, so, both TargetListFilter and CPUTargetList are 0, and the
> > distributor does not forward the interrupt to any CPU interface according
> > to gic documentation, then the SGI can't be occurred.
> > 
> > We have found this problem at nxp imx6ul platform, which is a cortex-a7
> > single core platform, the irq work (triggered by SGI at ARM) can't be
> > occurred which is needed for cpufreq, then the system has failed to boot
> > and reboot [1].
> 
> I'm really not keep on this, as even if we paper over the problem for
> platforms using a GIC, we still leave behind all the platform that are
> not capable of self-IPI (which is the vast majority of ARM UP systems).
> 

This is a SMP system, not UP system, just cpu number is one.
Current problem is if we support self-IPI for SMP system, when the GIC
in this system doesn't have distribute interrupt capability.

> Can you please provide a backtrace of the failing use case? Have you
> tried this patch [1], which did solve the issue for OMAP?

This patch is for Feb, 2016, and I use the next-20160722, the related code
is at my kernel (although some other code at context is different).

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen

      reply	other threads:[~2016-08-09  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-08  7:49 [PATCH 1/1] irqchip: irq-gic: forward SGI to itself for cortex-a7 single core Peter Chen
2016-08-08 10:50 ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-08 12:00   ` Peter Chen
2016-08-08 13:07     ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-08 13:28       ` Peter Chen
2016-08-08 13:48         ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-08 13:59           ` Marc Zyngier
2016-08-09  3:46             ` Peter Chen
2016-08-09  5:34               ` Marc Zyngier
2016-08-09  5:57                 ` Peter Chen
2016-08-09  6:59                   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-08-09  7:18                     ` Peter Chen
2016-08-09  8:54                       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-08-09  9:39                         ` Peter Chen
2016-08-09 10:08                           ` Marc Zyngier
2016-08-09 11:50                             ` Peter Chen
2016-08-09 13:03                         ` Fabio Estevam
2016-08-16 16:29                         ` Fabio Estevam
2016-08-16 16:48                           ` Marc Zyngier
2016-08-16 17:03                             ` Fabio Estevam
2016-08-16 18:09                               ` Fabio Estevam
2016-08-09  9:30   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-08 13:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-08-09  3:16   ` Peter Chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160809031654.GA31105@shlinux2 \
    --to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).