linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH]: arm64: factor work_pending state machine to C
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:21:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160809102131.GD27508@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2af2833-3e4f-10a9-f568-9f19efc9186f@mellanox.com>

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:16:07PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 7/11/2016 8:19 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:49:01PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:43:50AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> >>>>I am hopeful that this patch [1] can be picked up for the 4.8 merge window
> >>>>in the arm64 tree.  As I mentioned in my last patch series that included
> >>>>this patch [2], I'm hopeful that this version addresses the performance
> >>>>issues that were seen with Mark's original patch.  This version tests the
> >>>>TIF flags prior to calling out to the loop in C code.
> >>>I still need to get round to measuring that again. This might also
> >>>conflict with a late fix I just sent for 4.7.
> >>FWIW, I've failed to measure any performance overhead from this change,
> >>so it certainly looks better thsn Mark's original patch from that angle.
> >FWIW, likewise, with perf bench sched atop of v4.7-rc6.
> 
> I don't see this commit pushed up as part of what's in 4.8 so far. Any chance
> it's going to go in later in the merge window?  I'm just hoping to trim down the
> task-isolation series by being able to drop this patch from its next iteration... :-)

I'll queue it up for 4.9, once I've had a closer look.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-09 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1459877922-15512-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
2016-04-05 17:38 ` [PATCH v12 12/13] arm64: factor work_pending state machine to C Chris Metcalf
2016-07-08 15:43   ` [PATCH]: " Chris Metcalf
2016-07-08 15:49     ` Will Deacon
2016-07-08 16:11       ` Chris Metcalf
2016-07-11 11:42       ` Will Deacon
2016-07-11 12:19         ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-29 18:16           ` Chris Metcalf
2016-08-09 10:21             ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-04-05 17:38 ` [PATCH v12 13/13] arch/arm64: enable task isolation functionality Chris Metcalf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160809102131.GD27508@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).