From: oleg@redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Add uprobe support
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:49:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160809184943.GA17112@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abaac6ebaa5dd63889803ec568663bc8c8c65b02.1470114993.git.panand@redhat.com>
On 08/02, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
> This patch adds support for uprobe on ARM64 architecture.
I know nothing about ARM, so I can't actually review this change.
But it looks good to me ;)
Just one note,
> +int arch_uprobe_pre_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct uprobe_task *utask = current->utask;
> +
> + /* saved fault code is restored in post_xol */
> + utask->autask.saved_fault_code = current->thread.fault_code;
> +
> + /* An invalid fault code between pre/post xol event */
> + current->thread.fault_code = UPROBE_INV_FAULT_CODE;
> +
> + /* Instruction point to execute ol */
> + instruction_pointer_set(regs, utask->xol_vaddr);
> +
> + user_enable_single_step(current);
I don't think we want user_{enable,disable{_single_step in the long term,
please look at 9bd1190a11c9d2 "uprobes/x86: Do not (ab)use TIF_SINGLESTEP
/user_*_single_step() for single-stepping". it seems that ARM64 sets/clears
TIF_SINGLESTEP. You can also lool at saved_tf logic, probably ARM64 needs
the same.
However, I agree we can do this later and initial version can use these
ptrace helpers.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-09 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 5:30 [PATCH 0/5] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
2016-08-02 5:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: kprobe: protect/rename few definitions to be reused by uprobe Pratyush Anand
2016-08-02 5:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: kgdb_step_brk_fn: ignore other's exception Pratyush Anand
2016-08-02 5:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well Pratyush Anand
2016-09-06 16:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-06 21:36 ` David Long
2016-09-07 4:47 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-09-07 13:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-02 5:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Handle TRAP_BRKPT " Pratyush Anand
2016-09-06 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-02 5:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Add uprobe support Pratyush Anand
2016-08-09 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-08-24 7:13 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-08-24 15:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-24 15:56 ` Will Deacon
2016-08-25 13:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-09-20 16:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-21 11:00 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-09-21 17:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-22 3:23 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-09-22 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-23 4:12 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-09-23 13:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-25 17:02 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-09-26 11:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-26 13:03 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-09-27 13:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-27 15:03 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-09-28 17:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-24 7:26 ` [PATCH 0/5] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
2016-09-20 2:51 ` Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160809184943.GA17112@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).