From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND v2 10/10] gpio: stmpe: Add STMPE1600 support
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:30:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160810083025.GP1581@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470814755-19447-11-git-send-email-patrice.chotard@st.com>
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, patrice.chotard at st.com wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
>
> The particularities of this variant are:
> - GPIO_XXX_LSB and GPIO_XXX_MSB memory locations are inverted compared
> to other variants.
> - There is no Edge detection, Rising Edge and Falling Edge registers.
> - IRQ flags are cleared when read, no need to write in Status register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> index 6d6d76a..32c5a72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,9 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */
> - if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801)
> + /* STMPE801 and STMPE 1600 don't have RE and FE registers */
> + if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 ||
> + stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600)
> return 0;
>
> if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
> @@ -173,9 +174,10 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
> int i, j;
>
> for (i = 0; i < CACHE_NR_REGS; i++) {
> - /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */
> - if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801) &&
> - (i != REG_IE))
> + /* STMPE801 and STMPE1600 don't have RE and FE registers */
> + if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 ||
> + stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) &&
> + (i != REG_IE))
> continue;
>
> for (j = 0; j < num_banks; j++) {
> @@ -208,11 +210,21 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> int offset = d->hwirq;
> int regoffset = offset / 8;
> int mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>
> stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][regoffset] |= mask;
> +
> + /*
> + * STMPE1600 workaround: to be able to get IRQ from pins,
> + * a read must be done on GPMR register, or a write in
> + * GPSR or GPCR registers
> + */
> + if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600)
> + stmpe_reg_read(stmpe,
> + stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB + regoffset]);
> }
>
> static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
> @@ -285,6 +297,7 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
> fall = !!(ret & mask);
>
> case STMPE801:
> + case STMPE1600:
> irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB + bank];
> break;
>
> @@ -331,18 +344,32 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)
> {
> struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = dev;
> struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> - u8 statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB];
> + u8 statmsbreg;
> int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8);
> u8 status[num_banks];
> int ret;
> int i;
>
> + /*
> + * the stmpe_block_read() call below, imposes to set statmsbreg
> + * with the register located at the lowest address. As STMPE1600
> + * variant is the only one which respect registers address's order
> + * (LSB regs located at lowest address than MSB ones) whereas all
> + * the others have a registers layout with MSB located before the
> + * LSB regs.
> + */
> + if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600)
> + statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_LSB];
> + else
> + statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB];
> +
> ret = stmpe_block_read(stmpe, statmsbreg, num_banks, status);
> if (ret < 0)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> - int bank = num_banks - i - 1;
> + int bank = (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) ? i :
> + num_banks - i - 1;
> unsigned int enabled = stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][bank];
> unsigned int stat = status[i];
>
> @@ -362,10 +389,11 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)
>
> /*
> * interrupt status register write has no effect on
> - * 801 and 1801, bits are cleared when read.
> - * Edge detect register is not present on 801 and 1801
> + * 801/1801/1600, bits are cleared when read.
> + * Edge detect register is not present on 801/1600/1801
> */
> - if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) {
> + if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1600 ||
> + stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) {
> stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, statmsbreg + i, status[i]);
> stmpe_reg_write(stmpe,
> stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + i],
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-10 7:39 [RESEND v2 00/10] STMPE fixes/rework and add STMPE1600 support patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 01/10] mfd: stmpe: Add STMPE_IDX_SYS_CTRL/2 enum patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:28 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 02/10] mfd: stmpe: Add reset support for all STMPE variant patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:28 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 03/10] gpio: stmpe: fix edge and rising/falling edge detection patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:29 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 04/10] gpio: stmpe: write int status register only when needed patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:29 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 05/10] mfd: stmpe: use generic bit mask name patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:29 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 06/10] mfd: stmpe: rework registers access patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:29 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 07/10] gpio: " patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:29 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 08/10] Documentation: dt: add stmpe1600 compatible string to stmpe mfd patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:30 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 09/10] mfd: Add STMPE1600 support patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:30 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10 7:39 ` [RESEND v2 10/10] gpio: stmpe: " patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10 8:30 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-08-10 8:42 ` [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD and GPIO due for v4.9 Lee Jones
2016-08-11 12:07 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160810083025.GP1581@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).