[PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Baole Ni]

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c
index 460c134..8128e25 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ enum stu300_error {
 
 /* I2C clock speed, in Hz 0-400kHz*/
 static unsigned int scl_frequency = 100000;
-module_param(scl_frequency, uint,  0644);
+module_param(scl_frequency, uint,  S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 /**
  * struct stu300_dev - the stu300 driver state holder
-- 
2.9.2

[PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> wrote:

> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I assume Wolfram will merge this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:02:05 PM CEST Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> I assume Wolfram will merge this.

I assume not, see http://lwn.net/Articles/696227/

	Arnd

[PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Wolfram Sang]

> > I assume Wolfram will merge this.
> 
> I assume not, see http://lwn.net/Articles/696227/

Thanks for the pointer. I missed the discussion but came up with the
same conclusions: a) octals are easier to read and b) original author
should have asked if this change was feasible before posting 1285
patches :(

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160810/3b814757/attachment.sig>