From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: suspend: avoid potential TLB conflict
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:01:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160811110143.GB3805@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57AAF666.2030501@arm.com>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:39:50AM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 09/08/16 18:51, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:25:37PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> >> fe12c00d21bb ("PM / hibernate: Introduce test_resume mode for hibernation") came
> >> in with the merge window, this does a suspend followed by a resume with the user
> >> page tables still loaded in ttbr0_el1.
> >
> > Hmmm... given that, it looks like if we bail out in swsusp_arch_resume()
> > after the call to create_safe_exec_page(), we may return to userspace
> > with a corrupted TTBR0.
>
> Ah, didn't spot that.
>
> > We probably need to defer the call to create_safe_exec_page() after the
> > other potential failure sites so as to avoid that.
> >
> > Looking around it's not clear to me how/where the get_safe_page()
> > allocations are cleaned up when a failure occurs.
>
> Its dealt with by the core code: they get added to to one of
> kernel/power/snapshot.c's plethora of bitmaps, and freed via
> free_basic_memory_bitmaps() -> memory_bm_free() -> free_list_of_pages() ->
> free_image_page().
>
> It looks like pages allocated by get_safe_page() are on the 'forbidden_pages_map'.
Thanks for the pointer!
Given that, it looks like a simple reshuffling of swsusp_arch_resume is
all that's necessary. I'll spin that along with v2 of this patch.
Thanks,
Mark.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 10:10 [PATCH] arm64: suspend: avoid potential TLB conflict Mark Rutland
2016-08-09 16:25 ` James Morse
2016-08-09 16:49 ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-09 17:51 ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-10 9:39 ` James Morse
2016-08-11 11:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160811110143.GB3805@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).