From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org (Bjorn Andersson) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:23:25 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions In-Reply-To: References: <20160719154905.23344-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160810174049.GO26240@tuxbot> <7650e5fa-f52c-1ab5-e197-8630fd7d0322@ti.com> <20160810204049.GV26240@tuxbot> <20160810211947.GW26240@tuxbot> Message-ID: <20160811182325.GY26240@tuxbot> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed 10 Aug 15:44 PDT 2016, Suman Anna wrote: > On 08/10/2016 04:19 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Wed 10 Aug 14:04 PDT 2016, Suman Anna wrote: > > [..] > > As far as cleaning up wkup_m3_ipc, patch 2 does that and cleans out the > > old implementation and with that wkup_m3_ipc is moved to the new API. > > > > So the only issue is that the wkup_m3_ipc DT binding states that the > > property should be named "ti,rproc" and as such someone has to send a > > patch to that and make an argument that we don't have to maintain > > backwards compatibility. But as this is used in am33xx.dtsi and > > am4372.dtsi that might be too late? > > I could fix up the wkup_m3_ipc driver using of_update_property() / > of_remove_property(), but looks like these are not exported. I am not > sure if there are any specific reasons as to why these were not > exported. So, for now, we may have to go with the current code. > Sorry I didn't think that far, that would be the preferred solution. Regards, Bjorn