From: mhiramat@kernel.org (Masami Hiramatsu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: kprobes: Document jprobes stack copying limitations
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 08:46:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160813084626.06b972afea3814959ab64ebc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471033484-2709-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:24:44 -0400
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
>
> Some architectures (i.e.: sparc64 and arm64) make reasonable partial stack
> duplication for jprobes problematic. Document this.
>
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks!
> ---
> Documentation/kprobes.txt | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
> index 1f9b3e2..1f6d45a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
> @@ -103,6 +103,16 @@ Note that the probed function's args may be passed on the stack
> or in registers. The jprobe will work in either case, so long as the
> handler's prototype matches that of the probed function.
>
> +Note that in some architectures (e.g.: arm64 and sparc64) the stack
> +copy is not done, as the actual location of stacked parameters may be
> +outside of a reasonable MAX_STACK_SIZE value and because that location
> +cannot be determined by the jprobes code. In this case the jprobes
> +user must be careful to make certain the calling signature of the
> +function does not cause parameters to be passed on the stack (e.g.:
> +more than eight function arguments, an argument of more than sixteen
> +bytes, or more than 64 bytes of argument data, depending on
> +architecture).
> +
> 1.3 Return Probes
>
> 1.3.1 How Does a Return Probe Work?
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-12 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-12 20:24 [PATCH] Documentation: kprobes: Document jprobes stack copying limitations David Long
2016-08-12 23:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2016-08-15 14:25 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-08-15 14:49 ` David Long
2016-08-15 15:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-08-15 15:41 ` David Long
2016-08-15 15:41 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160813084626.06b972afea3814959ab64ebc@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).