linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:37:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160815103721.GF13262@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_8d7Vf+TzQnqaofNj62L-=qkht4av-6mCYZoWkucz8RA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:31:29PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 15 August 2016 at 12:30, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:21:00PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> As to Will's point, I suppose there is a window where a speculative
> >> TLB fill could occur, so I suppose that means updating TTBR0_EL1.ASID
> >> first, then TCR_EL1.EPD0, and finally perform the TLBI ASIDE1 on the
> >> reserved ASID.
> >
> > But then what do you gain from the reserved ASID?
> >
> 
> To prevent TLB hits against the ASID of the current (disabled)
> userland translation

Right, but if the sequence you described ensures that, then why not just
set TCR_EL1.EPD0 and do TLBI ASIDE1 on the current ASID?

I don't see the difference between a TLB entry formed from a speculative
fill using the reserved ASID and one formed using a non-reserved ASID --
the page table is the same.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-15 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-12 15:27 [PATCH 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching Catalin Marinas
2016-08-12 15:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64: Factor out PAN enabling/disabling into separate uaccess_* macros Catalin Marinas
2016-08-12 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: Factor out TTBR0_EL1 setting into a specific asm macro Catalin Marinas
2016-08-12 15:27 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: Introduce uaccess_{disable, enable} functionality based on TTBR0_EL1 Catalin Marinas
2016-08-12 15:27 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: Disable TTBR0_EL1 during normal kernel execution Catalin Marinas
2016-08-15 11:18   ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-15 16:39     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-12 15:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: Handle faults caused by inadvertent user access with PAN enabled Catalin Marinas
2016-08-12 15:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: xen: Enable user access before a privcmd hvc call Catalin Marinas
2016-08-15  9:58   ` Julien Grall
2016-08-15 18:00     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-08-12 15:27 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: Enable CONFIG_ARM64_TTBR0_PAN Catalin Marinas
2016-08-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching Kees Cook
2016-08-12 18:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-13  9:13 ` [kernel-hardening] " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-15  9:48   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-15  9:58     ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-15 10:02       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-15 10:06         ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-15 10:10           ` Will Deacon
2016-08-15 10:15             ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-15 10:21               ` Will Deacon
2016-08-15 10:21           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-15 10:30             ` Will Deacon
2016-08-15 10:31               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-15 10:37                 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-08-15 10:43                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-15 10:52                     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-15 10:56                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-15 11:02                         ` Will Deacon
2016-08-15 16:13                         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-15 19:04                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-15 11:00                     ` Will Deacon
2016-08-15 10:30             ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-15 10:08         ` Will Deacon
2016-08-26 15:39 ` David Brown
2016-08-26 17:24   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160815103721.GF13262@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).