[RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement API for vGICv3 live migration

[christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 07:37:47PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Vijaya,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:28:42PM +0530, vijay.kilari at gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@cavium.com>
> > 
> > This patchset adds API for saving and restoring
> > of VGICv3 registers to support live migration with new vgic feature.
> > This API definition is as per version of VGICv3 specification
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-July/445611.html
> > 
> > To test live migration with QEMU, use below patch series
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-08/msg01444.html
> > 
> > The patch 3 & 4 are picked from the Pavel's previous implementation.
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg122040.html
> > 
> > v1 => v2:
> >  - The init sequence change patch is no more required.
> >    Fixed in patch 2 by using static vgic_io_dev regions structure instead
> >    of using dynamic allocation pointer.
> >  - Updated commit message of patch 4.
> >  - Dropped usage of union to manage 32-bit and 64-bit access in patch 1.
> >    Used local variable for 32-bit access.
> >  - Updated macro __ARM64_SYS_REG and ARM64_SYS_REG in 
> >    arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h as per qemu requirements.
> > 
> I think you should have enough to go on by now for a new revision.  You
> can include the two patches I just sent with the series '[PATCH v2]
> Rework vgic_attr_regs_access' in the beginning of your series and then
> base your work on that, assuming nobody else screams about this.
> 
> If you use that approach, and you address the missing soft pending state
> etc. that Peter pointed out, then we should be ready for a detailed
> review.
> 
> Looking forward to the next version.
> 
FYI: I pushed the API doc and the refactoring patches to the 'queue'
branch of the kvmarm tree:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git

It would be good if you could base your patches on there for the next
revision.

Thanks,
-Christoffer