From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:39:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v7 03/14] arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
In-Reply-To: <1472024693-12912-4-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
References: <1472024693-12912-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
 <1472024693-12912-4-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20160826123929.GA30302@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:42PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/of_numa.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

The subject has arm64/numa, but this is clearly core OF code and
requires an ack from Rob.

The commit message also doesn't make much sense to me.

> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> index 7b3fbdc..afaeb9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
>  			 */
>  			continue;
> 
> +		if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> +			pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}

Do you really want to return from the function here? Shouldn't we at least
of_node_put(np), i.e. by using a break; ?

Will