linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V5 1/5] PCI: Embed pci_ecam_ops in pci_config_window structure
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:38:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160902153845.GA11234@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160901182345.GA18461@localhost>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:23:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > pci_config_window keeps pointer to pci_ecam_ops and every time
> > we want to deallocate pci_config_window (pci_ecam_free()) we need to make
> > sure to free pci_ecam_ops in case it was dynamically allocated prior to
> > pci_ecam_create() call.
> 
> I think this is a theoretical problem, right?  All the current callers
> pass a pointer to a static pci_ecam_ops struct that does not need to
> be deallocated.
> 
> I see that the next patch uses a pci_ecam_ops struct on the stack,

I asked Tomasz why we need to have pci_ecam_ops on the stack in the
first place since I do not think it is needed, or nicer (actually I
think it is not nice at all, what's the problem in making it static ?).

Anyway, that's part of this thread but I think Tomasz was looking
more for feedback/agreement on the whole quirks mechanism to check
if it is fine, more below.

> which would definitely cause issues without this patch, so I agree we
> need something like this; I'm just trying to make the changelog make
> more sense.
> 
> > To avoid that extra effort, embed pci_ecam_ops in pci_config_window,
> > instead of just a pointer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> > To: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>
> 
> This looks like an editing mistake?

Yes it is.

I think the most important bit about this series is to agree on
whether it is ok to keep quirks in drivers/pci/host/mcfg-quirks.c
or we need to find a different dir for it, and of course to make
sure the quirks mechanism is fine with everyone.

Thanks !
Lorenzo

> >  arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c  | 2 +-
> >  drivers/pci/ecam.c       | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > index acf3872..981e828 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
> > +	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops.pci_ops;
> >  	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common,
> >  				   ri->cfg);
> >  	if (!bus)
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/ecam.c b/drivers/pci/ecam.c
> > index 43ed08d..24242f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/ecam.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/ecam.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct pci_config_window *pci_ecam_create(struct device *dev,
> >  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >  
> >  	cfg->parent = dev;
> > -	cfg->ops = ops;
> > +	cfg->ops = *ops;
> >  	cfg->busr.start = busr->start;
> >  	cfg->busr.end = busr->end;
> >  	cfg->busr.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> >  			       int where)
> >  {
> >  	struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
> > -	unsigned int devfn_shift = cfg->ops->bus_shift - 8;
> > +	unsigned int devfn_shift = cfg->ops.bus_shift - 8;
> >  	unsigned int busn = bus->number;
> >  	void __iomem *base;
> >  
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> >  	if (per_bus_mapping)
> >  		base = cfg->winp[busn];
> >  	else
> > -		base = cfg->win + (busn << cfg->ops->bus_shift);
> > +		base = cfg->win + (busn << cfg->ops.bus_shift);
> >  	return base + (devfn << devfn_shift) + where;
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h
> > index 7adad20..0ce2920 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h
> > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct pci_config_window {
> >  	struct resource			res;
> >  	struct resource			busr;
> >  	void				*priv;
> > -	struct pci_ecam_ops		*ops;
> > +	struct pci_ecam_ops		ops;
> >  	union {
> >  		void __iomem		*win;	/* 64-bit single mapping */
> >  		void __iomem		**winp; /* 32-bit per-bus mapping */
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-02 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-08 13:05 [RFC PATCH V5 0/5] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-08 13:05 ` [RFC PATCH V5 1/5] PCI: Embed pci_ecam_ops in pci_config_window structure Tomasz Nowicki
2016-09-01 18:23   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-02 15:38     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-09-05  2:22       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-08 13:05 ` [RFC PATCH V5 2/5] PCI/ACPI: Move ACPI ECAM mapping to generic MCFG driver Tomasz Nowicki
2016-09-05  2:22   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-06 18:04     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-08 13:05 ` [RFC PATCH V5 3/5] PCI: Check platform specific ECAM quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-08 15:34   ` Mark Salter
2016-08-09  6:10     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-09-05  2:25   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-06 17:49     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-09-06 19:14       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-05  2:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-08 13:05 ` [RFC PATCH V5 4/5] ARM64/PCI: Start using quirks handling for ACPI based PCI host controller Tomasz Nowicki
2016-09-05  2:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-08 13:05 ` [RFC PATCH V5 5/5] PCI: thunder-pem: Support quirky configuration space access " Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-09 11:04   ` Robert Richter
2016-09-05  2:34   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-06 18:01     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-08 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH V5 0/5] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms Graeme Gregory
2016-08-08 19:44 ` Mark Salter
2016-08-09  9:20 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-08-09 10:29 ` Robert Richter
2016-08-09 14:20 ` Duc Dang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-08 12:56 Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-08 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH V5 1/5] PCI: Embed pci_ecam_ops in pci_config_window structure Tomasz Nowicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160902153845.GA11234@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).