From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:11:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: clk-imx35: fix name for ckil clk
In-Reply-To: <20160909062034.tim2tzcihui6inoa@pengutronix.de>
References: <1473327022-8065-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
 <20160909061631.GI16911@tiger>
 <20160909062034.tim2tzcihui6inoa@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20160909181138.GD7243@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/09, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> To += mturquette, sboyd
> 
> Hello Shawn, hello Michael, hello Stephen,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:16:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > This fixes
> > > 	[    0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17
> > > because the name is duplicated.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > 
> > I did not queue any clock patches for this cycle.  Can you please send
> > the patches directly to clock maintainers?
> 
> @shawnguo: Is this an ack?
> @mturquette, sboyd: should I resend? IMHO the first patch should go in
> soon.

Does the first patch need a fixes tag? We can apply them
directly.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project